The Black Heart of Darkness

Morgoth’s Review
January 8, 2017

A few weeks ago I was out walking the fields with my dog when she bolted after a rabbit grabbing it before it managed to escape into the hedge. With her jaws locked across the rabbit’s back my terrier then proceeded to vigorously shake the rabbit from side to side, breaking its spine and rupturing its internal organs, the rabbit squealed and went limp, the dog then dropped the rabbit and watched, amused with a slowly wagging tale, as life left the rabbit. The whole spectacle took about 15 seconds to play out and after I watched the dog to see if the killing had made and impact, did the dog understand what it had done? did it ‘feel’ anything at all?. The answer of course is no, it did not ‘care’ in any way shape or form, indeed, it is incapable of caring.

The reaction of many white people to the ”#BLMKidnapping” in which 4 blacks tortured a handicapped white man has been one of sheer incredulity at the cold barbarism of the blacks. It wasn’t just the fact that these blacks were capable of such an atrocity, it was the dumb, moronic laughs and delight with which they scalped and slashed the young white man. The Muslim terrorist will behead you, but before he does so he’ll chant prayers and offer you up as a sacrifice to Allah, he’s aware of the importance, the significance of his act and wraps it up with a degree of pomp and ceremony. There is no pomp and ceremony to black violence, there’s shits n giggles, and while it’s tempting to add a ”not all blacks” get out clause..lets face it, the crime stats are well known, the propensity of blacks to extreme violence is a fact of life.

Thanks to our ((entertainment industry)) most white people have been conned by the kindly grandfather figure of Morgan Freeman or too-early-for-Bond Idris Elba style black figureheads, what they saw this week was the reality. The reality is one in which you sit tied up with a gag around your mouth, you can meet your Negroid oppressor’s eyes and try and give him the ‘Hey man, come on, don’t do this” treatment and discover to your horror that nothing comes back, no empathy, no warmth, no humanity, you are the rabbit looking for sympathy in the eyes of the dog.

A poster on Stormfront succinctly explains why blacks behave in this way:

If we posit altruism and group cooperativeness as the evolved trait and selfishness and lack of empathy as the default (most animals do not exhibit altruistic tendencies outside their own family) then it follows that as populations of humans expanded globally out of Africa, they would have encountered environments where a cooperative personality gave differential selective advantage to those populations who could set aside their personal well-being for the benefit of the group and pull together for a hunt, then assure group cohesion by sharing the spoils and not raiding the winter larder and taking everything for oneself. This would have been especially true in the harsh temperate northern climes where Europeans and Asians evolved. Over time, in Europe and northern Asia you would expect to see greater degrees of group cooperativeness evolve as a survival strategy in a difficult environment with scare resources and small unstable populations. In warmer tropical climates where there is no need to prepare for winters and food and resources are plentiful all year long, an individual could get by without the high degree of empathy and altruism necessary in temperate zones.

Thus, those who stayed behind in Africa were not under increased selective pressure to be altruistic and could afford more self interest to be sure they get the resources they need and achieve social standing. An individual in this society would not be rewarded for altruistic behaviour and may indeed be taken advantage of by more ruthless members of the tribe who view him as an easy mark, reducing his selective advantage. In the modern world, you have thrown together disparate human populations which have evolved very different social survival strategies over millions of years. Whites are often shocked at the lack of remorse and shamelessness displayed by blacks when they are confronted with evidence lawless or immoral behaviour. Indeed, the black reaction to being caught embezzling or stealing is often denial or anger at the victim or what they perceive as “unjust” and “racist” system of white law. Seemingly average blacks seem to take any opportunity to proudly loot stores and are often angry at having to pay for anything during normal operation. Whites are also astonished at the speed at which blacks resort to violence over what whites see as trivial matters. Black men rape nearly 40,000 white women per year in the US alone. Rape cannot be attributed to economics, historical oppression, the nebulous “white privilege” or any other progressive excuse.

Joseph Conrad’s novel ‘Heart Of Darkness’ which was later turned into a Vietnam war movie,  ‘Apocalypse Now’, both feature ‘Kurtz’ as the main protagonist. Kurtz is the European man who’s charged with bringing European organization and civilization to the third world. However, he eventually comes to the conclusion that this is an impossible task and ‘goes native’ eschewing all European moral codes and virtues. Indeed, in Apocalypse Now there’s a good deal of left wing relativism too, Kurtz, played by Marlon Brando, has gone further and declared that Western civilization is itself based upon lies and hypocrisy. In one famous scene Kurtz explains ”We train young men to drop fire on people but they’re forbidden to write ”fuck!” on their airplanes because it’s ”obscene’‘.

The point Kurtz is making here is that Western civilization is no better than the primitive savagery of the third world, it’s just that we are more sophisticated about it, again, you can sense the leftism seeping in. However, Kurtz is wrong. European man might build elaborate war machines held up by complicated bureaucracies, and the end result will be death, but it is simply a means to an end, you can argue about  the validity of that end, but death and destruction is not the end in itself, the policy is. Contrast that to the African warlord who randomly slaughters and then eats! his enemies:

Cannibalism has been reported in several recent African conflicts, including the Second Congo War, and the civil wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone. A UN human rights expert reported in July 2007 that sexual atrocities against Congolese women go “far beyond rape” and include sexual slavery, forced incest, and cannibalism.[107] This may be done in desperation, as during peacetime cannibalism is much less frequent;[108] at other times, it is consciously directed at certain groups believed to be relatively helpless, such as Congo Pygmies, even considered subhuman by some other Congolese.[109] It is also reported by some that witch doctors sometimes use the body parts of children in their medicine.[110] In the 1970s the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin was reputed to practice cannibalism

After the Battle of Waterloo the Duke of Wellington did not eat Napoleon, he wasn’t even shot.

The African temperament ensures that the policy is death, violence and barbarism, like the blacks in Chicago, it’s done for the shits n giggles and it is this completely alien characteristic, which would be classed as psychotic in a European, which has so shocked so many white people over this last week. Our people are simply unaccustomed to viewing what amounts to an empathetic nullity, a void of unfeeling brutality.

The solution of course, is to segregate ourselves from these people, to live as far away as we reasonably can. And when we do so, it will be organized and implemented by well dressed white people using computers, schematics and spreadsheets, hell, we’ll even give the Africans a bottle of water for the journey. It is after all, just a means to an end, and the end is to have our people live free of these dark hearts.

Notable Replies

  1. The dog's instinct to kill the rabbit is not really for fun (although it may be somewhat fun for the dog), but just out of primordial drive/need to get food.

  2. Ironically, blacks have no souls.

  3. Although I understand the author's parallels between dogs and niggers, we should realize that in the case of the dogs they are not cruel and apathetic; they simply act from instinct alone, whereas the niggers on the other hand most certainly are cruel and apathetic. Shits n giggles.

    Great article, though, for sure.

Continue the discussion

27 more replies